buy cheapest viagra

Welcome to .txtLAB, a laboratory for cultural analytics at McGill University directed by Andrew Piper. We explore the use of computational and quantitative approaches towards understanding literature and culture in both the past and present. Our aim is to engage in critical and creative uses of the tools of network science, machine learning, or image processing to think about language, literature, and culture at both large and small scale.
Author Archive
On Prestige Bias in the Chronicle of Higher Ed

On Prestige Bias in the Chronicle of Higher Ed

The Chronicle of Higher Education ran a version of our essay on the concentration of institutional prestige as its cover story this week. In it we expand our reflections about how to change the current system. The essay is based on our original piece that appeared in Critical Inquiry. Here is an excerpt from the...
The Prestige Trap

The Prestige Trap

I am pleased to announce the publication of a new piece out with Chad Wellmon in Critical Inquiry entitled, “Publication, Power, and Patronage: On Inequality and Academic Publishing.” In it we discuss the concentration of a few elite institutions within a sample of four humanities journals stretching back over forty years. Our goal is to...
Think Small: On Literary Modelling

Think Small: On Literary Modelling

This is the name of a new piece I have out in PMLA in a section called “Franco Moretti’s Distant Reading.” The first point I try to make is that calling it “Moretti’s Distant Reading” is indicative of literary studies’ continued penchant for great men. It is ironic, or telling, that even in an issue...
Why are non-data driven representations of data-driven research in the humanities so bad?

Why are non-data driven representations of data-driven research in the humanities so bad?

One of the more frustrating aspects of working in data-driven research today is the representation of such research by people who do not use data. Why? Because it is not subject to the same rules of evidence. If you don’t like data, it turns out you can say whatever you want about people who do...
Data Visualization and Reading - An Interview

Data Visualization and Reading – An Interview

Mark Algee-Hewitt and I recently took part in an interview with Elyse Graham for a special issue of English Studies on “Data Visualization and the Humanities.” You can read her introduction here and our interview here. We touch on a bunch of topics about visualization: like whether data visualization is exclusively exploratory, whether the humanities...
Cultural Advocacy Internship - "Gender Bias in Book Reviews"

Cultural Advocacy Internship – “Gender Bias in Book Reviews”

We are excited to announce the 2017-2018 Internship in Cultural Advocacy, focusing on gender bias in book reviews. The internship will address how women are both mis-represented and under-represented in the public discourse of book reviewing. Book reviews represent a significant cultural outlet that bestows authority, but as our lab’s new website called “Just Review” shows, there are a...
LLCU 255: Intro to Literary Text Mining -- New Syllabus 2017

LLCU 255: Intro to Literary Text Mining — New Syllabus 2017

Less but better. That’s the essentialist’s motto and that’s the one I use every year when I revise my syllabus. I keep removing things and students keep learning more every year. While there is clearly a ceiling for this approach, it works remarkably well as a pedagogical tactic. Here’s the full syllabus. This year’s class...
Data, data, data. Why Katherine Bode's new piece is so important and why it gets so much wrong about the field

Data, data, data. Why Katherine Bode’s new piece is so important and why it gets so much wrong about the field

Katherine Bode has written an excellent new piece asking us to reflect more on the data we use for computational literary studies. Her argument is that many of the current data sets available, which rely on date of first publication as a criteria for selection, miss the more socially imbedded ways literary texts have circulated...
Congratulations to this year's students!

Congratulations to this year’s students!

We have had an excellent year at .txtLAB. I want to send out a special thanks to all of the students who have been contributing to the lab. You’ve made it a great place to work. Here is a list of projects that we’ve been working on this year: studying the ambiguity surrounding social interactions...
Just Review, a student led project on gender bias in book reviewing

Just Review, a student led project on gender bias in book reviewing

For years, women have been aware that their books are less likely to get reviewed in the popular press and they are also less likely to serve as reviewers of books. Projects like VIDA and CWILA were started to combat this kind of exclusion. Over time they have managed to make some change happen in the industry....
The Eleanor and Park Challenge

The Eleanor and Park Challenge

Eleanor & Park is a beautiful young adult novel about two kids who fall in love after meeting, as so many kids do, on the school bus. It also contains a perfect challenge for the computational study of culture. Think of it as an alternative to the Turing test. Here’s the back story. We’ve begun studying...
Connectivity. A Conference

Connectivity. A Conference

Looking forward to this event tomorrow. Bringing together researchers from different disciplines to develop models of cultural connectivity. Connectivity has become the dominant framework through which contemporary knowledge is increasingly understood. From networks to clouds to close reading to reconstructing historical social worlds, making connections is at the core of what academics are expected to do. And...